We have received 12 proposals for the Open Call Type B, and 1 proposal didn’t meet the eligibility requirements and another one had a too low score to be accepted according to the evaluations.
Each received proposal has been evaluated by 3 evaluators (two external evaluators and one internal to the EU-CIP consortium) giving a score according to an ad-hoc scorecard, following these evaluation fields:
- Compliance
- Excellence
- Impact
- Implementation
The evaluation results are the average score of the three evaluations. A “Final selection” phase ranked all proposals based on their evaluation scores, considering accepted the proposals with a score greater than 7. The winners are underlined in green:
| Proposals No. | Nationality | Eval_1 | Eval_2 | Eval_3 | AVERAGE Score |
| 1 | Germany | 9,75 | 9,92 | 10,42 | 10,03 |
| 2 | Serbia | 7,17 | 9,42 | 5,83 | 7,47 |
| 3 | Spain | 10,75 | 11,83 | 12,25 | 11,61 |
| 4 | Cyprus | 8,83 | 8,92 | 8,25 | 8,67 |
| 5 | Norway | 13,17 | 14 | 13,75 | 13,64 |
| 6 | Greece | 11,75 | 13,67 | 14 | 13,14 |
| 7 | Italy | 11,83 | 6,17 | 12,71 | 10,24 |
| 8 | Greece | 12,33 | 13,25 | 13,96 | 13,18 |
| 9 | Ireland | 0 | 7 | 6,83 | 6,61 |
| 10 | Germany | 8 | 5,92 | 12,92 | 8,95 |
| 11 | Greece | 8 | 11,92 | 13,5 | 11,14 |
| 12 | Belarus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The allocation of the Open Call budget for the EU-CIP project is a crucial aspect of ensuring the successful implementation of the initiative. With a total available budget of €270,000, the EU-CIP consortium has strategically earmarked €27,000 for each selected proposal, considering a total of 10 new experts who have been chosen through the open call.
